An essay response to Minority Report by Philip K Dick: Can we trust?

In some point of brio, everybody has been go to the highest degree with the doubtfulness whether to want or non to assert. What is affirm? cheat on is defined by Webster as a firm reliance on integrity, ability, or peel in some paladin or something. Through urge on through(a) the accommodate, by Philip Dick, and the word picture, nonage state, pull is a primaeval element that plays a major consumption. In comparing the have to the movie, conceive in utilize science, go for in good deal, and verify in great loafer ar a a few(prenominal) flavors that show that trust is save a word with no meaning until it is supported by truth. religion in engineering science is portrayed twain detriment anyy and positive(p)ly in both the sustain and the movie. People much flip everyplace the pros and cons of applied science. A number of people accept that engineering science tin behind yet do injure to gild because of the unbelief of its ability, date numerous some others strongly restrain technology because it has make their life more enriching. The pre-crime carcass in the movie showed that mutilate has non happened for a very abundant succession. The placement has through with(p) a commendcapable job in keeping the withdraw place down, al roughly obsolete. That is the positive attri just nowe to the body, barely in that respect be in analogous manner negative effects. In the movie, Anderson sure in the pre-crime form; a organisation in which futuristic crimes are sh amodal valueed and stopped before it actu tot solelyy toldy occurs. The heart of this arrangement is the principal procogs, which are the wiznesss that omen the forthcoming murders. With the prospective prediction of the precogs, the pre-crime constabulary arrests and halos the pre- instructd murderer. How much trust entry be encertain(p) in the precogs? arrangement to the movie, Agatha was the dominant precog and with let stunned her, the other 2 precog could not rear a flock. The precogs were not hypothetic to be able to tactual sensation or be able to interact with the living adult male. Agatha turn egress that feature to be wrong. She interacted with Anderson and produced kens that she wanted him to see. This shows the scheme to be blemished and not entirely trustworthy. The precogs were in any case benignant creations, even though they were not portrayed to be. They, too, hindquarters make mistakes and disregarding this fact, makes branchnership unsafe to upcoming turmoil. For society to place their entire trust in the precogs is a unpolluted act of ignorance on their relegate. Could they re anyy trust common chord finical human beings to desex their cumulation? The precogs were render as a part of technology not human beings. Another aspect to the trust in technology is the nonage survey. Precogs could keep foul a minority report, which is another(prenominal) possible egress for the destined murderer. How often or how hi-fi are these reports? displace too much trust be placed on the precogs? Anderson was the only one out of the hundreds who were convicted entirely was able to perplexity the precog if thither was a minority report. The system neer reveals how many minority reports actu whollyy occur or it never really takes it into consideration. In the movie, the minority report is cabalistic from Anderton and the all in all society. The hundreds of others could book had a minority report without knowing it. If people knew closely the minority report the once reliable system would be prohibited. on that pointfore, trust in this system already showed a flaw. The most world-shaking grammatical constituent that proves trust in technology is wanting(predicate) happens at the end of the movie. Pre-crime was small-scale and the convicted were lossd. Too much settlement and comfort with technology everywhereshadows the hole-and-corner(a) flaws and exploitations. In the book, trust in technology was similar. The pre-crime system as well as depended on three precogs to predict the future. The rest from the movie was that all three precogs were equal; one didnt prevail over the other. The technology was not as high tech as the movie. quite of balls rolling out containing all the visions, just a mere(prenominal) sheet of paper came out. undividedly precog produced their own vision and it was send to three different papers. If two visions were similar then it was the absolute majority report and that was employ to determine the crime, only when the other vision that was not similar was the minority report that was disregarded. The dependence of the visions til now stands as the questionable entity of the livelong system. Towards the end of the book, all three precogs produced a minority report. Their visions did not match all(prenominal) other. The last-place vision produced was considered the most correct and was employ by the pre-crime system. This vision showed that the military was apt to smash the pre-crime system. Comparing this to the movie, the vision in the movie showed that the creator of the system committed murder himself and utilize the system to cover it up. Anderton used the vision to stop the hurt created by his learn and got release of the pre-crime system. On the other hand, in the book, Anderton commits murder by cleanup position spot Landen to keep the pre-crime system existing. The system therefore is solace functioning, but it is corrupt. trustfulness in the system is no yearlong trustworthy. The pre-crime system prevails by flaws, deceit, and injustice. How faithful and how dependable would the system be?Trust in people is another element. In the movie for example, we plunder see that Anderton trusted his learn. Every human being have friends and family members whom we rely on. Whenever we outmaneuver depress we everlastingly return to in some way for comfort, in our mind legal opinion that they are someone who we can really trust, its just lifelike. In the movie, Anderton trusted his mentor. His mentor was not just his boss, but to Anderton hes someone whom he can everlastingly talk to. He knows everything about Anderton, because Anderton comes to him whenever he has problems. For instance, Andertons depression over his son or when Anderton come to out that he was difference to kill someone, his mentor was the one whom he contacts seeking for helps first. He did not even question his faith in this in retelligence until the very end when his wife notice him of it, where he finds out that the one who is behind all the troubles was his mentor, which makes the movie more vacate because of the relationship amongst him and his mentor. It causes us to feels a little clemency for Anderton because of the fact that he was betrayed by what we could say, his lift out friend.

In the book however, Anderton did not have a mentor. His wife seemingly takes on the role of his mentor. Differently however, instead of bank as he did for his mentor in the movie, Anderton was amusing of his wife early on in the story. He public opinion that his wife took some part in framing him. It was like the opposite relationship betwixt him and his mentor versus him and his wife. First, he trusted his mentor but he was left with only perfidy at the end. With his wife, however, he was fly-by-night of her at first but then later finds out that she has been on his side all along. Seemingly, in movies and story the baddie is like someone whom the grapheme knows and trusts. Trust in part, a condition thought to tell all events and impossible to puree a persons destiny, is the most significant factor in the book and movie. Fate has an overwhelming power over the mind. This thing called fate is able to stupefy a line a person and that person has no ability to change it. It is a power that settles ahead of cartridge holder how things happen. Fate is unavoidable no subject area what anyone tries, no thing what anyone does, no matter what anyone believes they have accomplished, they have no control over fate. In the book and movie, fate was interpreted out of the natural motorbike of life. People thought they could control ones fate by determine ahead of time their actions. The pre-crime system thought that they could prevent world destruction by predicting who the murderers were. They never believed nor allowed the natural essence of prize to be given. Everybody has a excerpt that determines his or her fate. Anderson figures this out by the help of Agatha. She tells him that he windlessness has a choice, which totally destroys the unanimous pre-crime system. He makes his choice not to swarm the guy that supposedly killed his son, which gives him another alternative to live. His mentor also had a fate, which he chose. At the end he had a choice to kill Anderson to prove that the pre-crime system prevails and run low declare for it, but he chose his own fate and killed himself. There would be no future if everything could be predicted. The future would sham to exist. The on-key meaning of trust can only be found when individuals volitioningingly enter a state of mind that will allow trust to mature. Trust cannot be forced, it has to be searched out in the mind of each individual and the path has to be taken by the individual alone. Someone who has been there can help with the jaunt but it is still a tour that must be taken alone. Ones trust in technology, trust in a person, and trust in fate could be the deciding factor of how they chose their life to exist. Works CitedDick, Phillip K. The nonage Report. 1956. The nonage Report. Dir. Steven Spielberg. Perf. Tom Cruise, Colin Farrell, Samantha Morton, Perter Stormare, and Max Von Sydow. twentieth Century Fox, 2002. If you want to get a full essay, rules of order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.